Repository navigation
Scripts list patch - #74
Conversation
…d profiles. The HTML/CSS is fucked up but that's not my job. Closes #55.
|
As usual, someone please test and hit the merge button. Edit: Screw it. From now on until the site is actually working, I'm just going to merge things myself. |
|
Did some fast testing and looks great. Only feedback I have is Off-topic: just merge your stuff when you have something finished; you're the only active dev and the site isn't released anyways. If someone disagrees we can start a discussion. |
That's only true if you're sorting by a text field. Numeric and date fields are sorted descending by default. There are a total of four separate parameters and they have default values (which is when they'll be hidden), but you could also use the explicit url. My goal was to keep urls as clean as possible, but still make them powerful.
Yeah, I figured that out today. |
I understand that and those urls are great, but that still gives us two urls to the same content (descending or ascending, doesn't matter), resulting in an SEO penalty. |
|
I suggest using the Throwing an |
|
Was there a specific reason for using route parameters rather than query string parameters? |
Put a sortable and orderable list of scripts on both the home page and profiles. The HTML/CSS is fucked up but that's not my job. Closes #55.