Skip to content

Why types are not shipped into npm together? #633

Description

@JounQin

This project is written in TypeScript now, but we can't use its typings directly.

Activity

  1. added
    bugFunctionality that does not work as intended/expected
    on May 26, 2021
  2. thedaviddias commented on May 26, 2021

    @thedaviddias
    Member

    @JounQin thanks for pointing that out. I will review this soon.

  3. added
    bot:staleIssue marked as stale because there was no activity
    on Jul 25, 2021
  4. JounQin commented on Jul 27, 2021

    @JounQin
    Author
  5. removed
    bot:staleIssue marked as stale because there was no activity
    on Jul 27, 2021
  6. added
    bot:staleIssue marked as stale because there was no activity
    on Sep 25, 2021
  7. added
    keep-unstaleThe issue will not be marked as stale by the stale-bot
    and removed
    bot:staleIssue marked as stale because there was no activity
    on Oct 23, 2021
  8. martin-badin commented on Jan 14, 2022

    @martin-badin

    I created PR to solve this issue #865

  9. deleted a comment from stale on Sep 14, 2022
  10. deleted a comment from stale on Sep 14, 2022
  11. admir86 commented on Jan 31, 2023

    @admir86

    any updates on this?

  12. broofa commented on Oct 23, 2023

    @broofa

    Landed here while trying to figure out why TS was complaining about "href-abs-or-rel": false as a config option (docs explicitly say false is a valid value!). Was over at the Definitely Typed project looking at the type defs there, then came here to see if they aligned with the source code here and was surprised to see everything written in TS here.

    So... I guess that's two bugs. Types don't align with the docs, and types should really be published with the package.

  13. JounQin commented on Oct 24, 2023

    @JounQin
    Author

    I don't think this project is actively maintained by @thedaviddias sadly.

  14. hyperupcall commented on Oct 26, 2023

    @hyperupcall
    Contributor

    This is something I'd be interested in tackling, but (the old PR implementing this was closed), but it seems that good features are stalled in the PR queue. I currently have 2 small PRs that still need to be reviewed and merged.

  15. added theissue type on Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugFunctionality that does not work as intended/expectedkeep-unstaleThe issue will not be marked as stale by the stale-bot

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions