You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@devsnek it is unfortunate that it is impossible to +1 without pinging people - I'm also not aware of the process around the +1s at all like Anna. I just thought we were being kind to the nominee and showing we acknowledge their contribution and are 👍 on adding them.
(for the future, please comment instead of reacting)
I'm not against people commenting if they want to explicitly endorse a collaborator nomination, but my person opinion is that a +1 post on its own is just noise, especially since the process around nominations is based on there not being any objections and is not a vote (i.e. the +1's don't influence the outcome of the process):
If there are no objections raised by any Collaborators one week after the issue is opened, the nomination will be considered as accepted. Should there be any objections against the nomination, the TSC is responsible for working with the individuals involved and finding a resolution. The nomination must be approved by the TSC, which is assumed when there are no objections from any TSC members.
Activity
mhdawson commentedon Jul 22, 2018
@nodejs/collaborators
devsnek commentedon Jul 22, 2018
just for clarity, @ChALkeR, @addaleax, @richardlau, @targos, @thefourtheye and @benjamingr have thumbed-up
(for the future, please comment instead of reacting)
devsnek commentedon Jul 22, 2018
+1
addaleax commentedon Jul 22, 2018
@devsnek Is there any particular reason you prefer commenting/is this documented somewhere?
devsnek commentedon Jul 22, 2018
@addaleax after enough people react you have to use the api to see the full list
edit: i'm not trying to say you shouldn't react, just make sure if you want to be explicit that you also comment.
benjamingr commentedon Jul 22, 2018
@devsnek it is unfortunate that it is impossible to +1 without pinging people - I'm also not aware of the process around the +1s at all like Anna. I just thought we were being kind to the nominee and showing we acknowledge their contribution and are 👍 on adding them.
In any case - +1
ryzokuken commentedon Jul 22, 2018
+1
mcollina commentedon Jul 22, 2018
+1
ChALkeR commentedon Jul 22, 2018
Ok, to be explicit: +1
gireeshpunathil commentedon Jul 22, 2018
+1
richardlau commentedon Jul 22, 2018
I'm not against people commenting if they want to explicitly endorse a collaborator nomination, but my person opinion is that a
+1post on its own is just noise, especially since the process around nominations is based on there not being any objections and is not a vote (i.e. the+1's don't influence the outcome of the process):https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#collaborator-nominations
But in any case since I am commenting +1 from me (with a disclaimer that I work in the same office/team as @gdams at IBM).
cjihrig commentedon Jul 22, 2018
+1
trivikr commentedon Jul 24, 2018
+1
gdams commentedon Jul 27, 2018
Thanks for the nomination @mhdawson! 🎉
richardlau commentedon Aug 10, 2018
This happened in #22236.