Skip to content

Distributing and Installing with Homebrew #1171

Description

@cylewaitforit

Description

On one of my devices I use Bluefin Dx which is a Universal-Blue/Atomic Fedora based distro. I cannot install vite plus using curl as it would be wiped away by the next OS update. As such, they recommend installing CLI tools using Homebrew so that the software can be reapplied after an update.

Suggested solution

In Universal-Blue/Atomic Fedora based distros(like Bazzite Dx or Bluefin Dx) they recommend installing CLI tools using Homebrew (see: https://docs.bazzite.gg/Installing_and_Managing_Software/software-intro/).

Would the vite-plus team consider also distributing via homebrew? This may also be helpful for enterprises that use WorkBrew.

Alternative

No response

Additional context

No response

Validations

  • Read the Contributing Guidelines.
  • Confirm this request is for Vite+ itself and not for Vite, Vitest, tsdown, Rolldown, or Oxc.
  • Check that there isn't already an issue requesting the same feature.

Activity

  1. fengmk2 commented on Mar 27, 2026

    @fengmk2
    Member

    We already have plans to provide a Homebrew installation, with plans to complete it before the Beta version release

  2. self-assigned this
    on Mar 28, 2026
  3. markmals commented on Apr 1, 2026

    @markmals

    I've created a custom Homebrew formula which can be used in the meantime while waiting for the official formula:

    brew tap markmals/tap
    brew install vite-plus
  4. cylewaitforit commented on Apr 14, 2026

    @cylewaitforit
    Author

    This is listed in the Q2 roadmap issue #1324

  5. methbkts commented on Apr 26, 2026

    @methbkts

    There is a formula on the homebrew-core repo (Homebrew's official formulae repo)
    https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/main/Formula/v/vite-plus.rb

  6. added this to the Beta milestone on May 18, 2026
  7. modified the milestones: Beta, RC on Jul 6, 2026
  8. Arcadi4 commented on Jul 7, 2026

    @Arcadi4
    Contributor
  9. fengmk2 commented on Jul 10, 2026

    @fengmk2
    Member
  10. devharshthakur commented on Sep 6, 2026

    @devharshthakur

    Custom tap should be implemented now, i do not know why this issue is not yet resolved, nubjs did in hours on opening the issue

  11. Arcadi4 commented on Sep 6, 2026

    @Arcadi4
    Contributor

    Custom tap should be implemented now, i do not know why this issue is not yet resolved, nubjs did in hours on opening the issue

    ikr... it takes just a few minutes to set up a self-hosted tap. don't know what's blocking them here

  12. devharshthakur commented on Sep 7, 2026

    @devharshthakur

    Custom tap should be implemented now, i do not know why this issue is not yet resolved, nubjs did in hours on opening the issue

    ikr... it takes just a few minutes to set up a self-hosted tap. don't know what's blocking them here

    yes exactly that is what i am talking about

  13. devharshthakur commented on Sep 7, 2026

    @devharshthakur

    It is better than being in core sometimes it become stale or behind , self hosted taps are better

  14. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 3, 2026
    8ea2f84
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Fields

Priority

None yet

Start date

None yet

Target date

None yet

Effort

None yet

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions